<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?><!-- generator=Zoho Sites --><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><atom:link href="https://www.rakshaagarwal.in/blogs/tag/case-laws-income-tax-ruling/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><title>RAKSHA AGARWAL AND ASSOCIATES - Blog #case laws,income tax,ruling</title><description>RAKSHA AGARWAL AND ASSOCIATES - Blog #case laws,income tax,ruling</description><link>https://www.rakshaagarwal.in/blogs/tag/case-laws-income-tax-ruling</link><lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 22:04:35 +0530</lastBuildDate><generator>http://zoho.com/sites/</generator><item><title><![CDATA[SUPERMAX PERSONAL CARE PVT LTD vs. DEPUTY CIT (LTU)-1]]></title><link>https://www.rakshaagarwal.in/blogs/post/supermax-personal-care-pvt-ltd-vs.-deputy-cit-ltu-1</link><description><![CDATA[<img align="left" hspace="5" src="https://www.rakshaagarwal.in/tax-compliance.jpg"/>Issue:&nbsp;Additional depreciation under section 32(1)(iia): Whether allowance is mandatory So when you are a manufacturing company and purchase a new ]]></description><content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="zpcontent-container blogpost-container "><div data-element-id="elm_QX_GaQS1RqGZxIRSiQgtYQ" data-element-type="section" class="zpsection "><style type="text/css"></style><div class="zpcontainer-fluid zpcontainer"><div data-element-id="elm_GdAKUfG9RvmdyMuIsvsvsg" data-element-type="row" class="zprow zprow-container zpalign-items- zpjustify-content- " data-equal-column=""><style type="text/css"></style><div data-element-id="elm_ixfPnkH7Smads8XWCH2exQ" data-element-type="column" class="zpelem-col zpcol-12 zpcol-md-12 zpcol-sm-12 zpalign-self- "><style type="text/css"></style><div data-element-id="elm_4beWu5RbRZeA2EsbJdWQxA" data-element-type="text" class="zpelement zpelem-text "><style> [data-element-id="elm_4beWu5RbRZeA2EsbJdWQxA"].zpelem-text { border-style:solid; border-color:#000000 !important; border-width:1px; border-radius:1px; } </style><div class="zptext zptext-align-center " data-editor="true"><div><div><div><div style="line-height:1.2;"><div style="line-height:1.2;"><p><span style="font-style:italic;text-decoration-line:underline;font-family:&quot;times new roman&quot;, serif;"><br></span></p><h4><span style="font-size:20px;font-style:italic;text-decoration-line:underline;font-family:&quot;times new roman&quot;, serif;">Issue:&nbsp;Additional depreciation under section 32(1)(iia): Whether allowance is mandatory</span></h4><div><span style="font-size:20px;font-family:&quot;times new roman&quot;, serif;"><br></span></div><div style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;text-decoration-line:underline;font-family:&quot;times new roman&quot;, serif;">So when you are a manufacturing company and purchase a new plant and machinery on 1.11.2021 ,for let's say 10,00,000.Apart from normal depreciation of 7.5%(15% for a year),you can also claim additional depreciation of 10%(20% for a year) in FY 21-22.Now in FY 22-23 can we claim the balance 10% additional depreciation or will it lapse??Let's see what the case ruling has to say in this !</span></div><h4><div style="text-align:justify;"></div></h4><h4 style="line-height:1.2;"><div style="text-align:justify;"><span style="font-size:20px;text-decoration-line:underline;font-style:italic;font-family:&quot;times new roman&quot;, serif;"><br></span></div><p style="text-align:justify;margin-bottom:10px;line-height:1.2;"><span style="font-size:20px;font-family:&quot;times new roman&quot;, serif;">The assessee purchased and installed certain new plant and machinery in financial year 2011-12 corresponding to Assessment Year 2012-13. Since, the new assets were put to use for a period less than 180 days in Assessment Year 2012-13, the additional depreciation allowable at 20% to the assessee was restricted to 50% as per Second Proviso to section 32(1)(iia).&nbsp;In Assessment Year 2012-13 the assessee purchased new plant and machinery on which additional depreciation @20% is allowable. However, since the plant and machinery were put to use for a period of less than 180 days in Assessment Year 2012-13, the additional depreciation was restricted to 50% of the admissible amount. In other words, depreciation was allowed @10%. The balance unclaimed additional depreciation was claimed by the assessee in the impugned assessment year. The law is fairly well settled that the balance unclaimed amount of additional depreciation has to be allowed to the assessee in the immediately succeeding assessment year.</span></p></h4></div></div></div></div></div></div>
</div><div data-element-id="elm_3wZaSIgSQ0yfbYvnOcuBLg" data-element-type="button" class="zpelement zpelem-button "><style> [data-element-id="elm_3wZaSIgSQ0yfbYvnOcuBLg"].zpelem-button{ border-radius:1px; } </style><div class="zpbutton-container zpbutton-align-center "><style type="text/css"></style><a class="zpbutton-wrapper zpbutton zpbutton-type-primary zpbutton-size-md zpbutton-style-none " href="mailto:icaimember.raksha@gmail.com?subject=Interested%20in%20writing%20Article&amp;body=Hi%2Cmy%20details%20are%20as%20follows%3A%0AName%3A%0AProfession%3A%0AExperience%20in%20writing%3A%0AInterests%3A%0ACity%3A%0AContact%20No%3A"><span class="zpbutton-content">Want to contribute article?</span></a></div>
</div></div></div></div></div></div> ]]></content:encoded><pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2021 10:47:20 +0530</pubDate></item></channel></rss>